Raw+ Account: Fixed Commission, Leverage You Choose · FxPro Morocco
The FxPro Raw+ account: raw spreads from 0.0 pips plus a commission, built for active traders and scalpers.
Open FxPro Account →The Raw+ account and the leverage setting are chosen on the same screen and answer unrelated questions. Raw+ answers what one lot costs to enter: a raw spread plus a commission of $3.50 per lot per side, $7.00 round turn. The setting answers what that lot ties up while it is open, from 3.33% of notional at 1:30 down to 0.5% at 1:200. Neither reaches into the other - a higher setting does not move the rate, and a raw account does not free a unit of room. They meet in one place only, which is the size, because both are quoted per lot.
What Raw+ actually delivers (measured)
What the Raw+ account actually delivered when we measured it on FxPro’s own MT5 feed:
- EUR/USD measured at a 0.2-pip median spread and about $9.00 all-in per standard lot.
- That breaks even in 0.9 pips, and the spread measured perfectly stable (stability ratio 1) — tight and steady enough to scalp.
- Across the majors the measured spread sat at or below an independent interbank reference feed (EUR/USD −0.1, AUD/USD −0.5, USD/CAD −0.7 pips).
- Market orders in our test filled in about 78 to 99 milliseconds with near-zero slippage and no rejects.
- Raw+ commission is tiered by order size, with a minimum on the smallest size:
| Order size | Commission (Raw+) |
|---|---|
| 0.01 lot | $4.00 per side |
| 0.1 lot | $3.50 per side |
| 1.0 lot | $3.50 per side |
First-hand from the live feed — full detail on our measured spreads and execution pages.
FxPro Raw+ at a glance
- Raw spreads from 0.0 pips on major pairs
- Commission of $3.50 per lot per side
- Built for frequent traders and scalpers
- Runs on MetaTrader 4 (cTrader offers a similar raw model)
- Contrasts with the Standard all-in-spread account
The rate is per lot, so a setting reaches it only through size
The commission is a rate rather than a bill. It stands at $3.50 per lot per side and no setting on the account edits it. What a setting does edit is the largest position the balance will carry, and a rate quoted per lot turns a larger position into a larger charge in exact proportion. That is the whole of the interaction between the two: one multiplies what the other prices.
It follows that the account model is easiest to judge at a fixed size. Judge it on the lots you actually place rather than on the lots your setting would permit - otherwise the verdict you reach about pricing is really a statement about your setting, dressed up as a comparison of accounts.
What a raw account does not do to the room behind a position
A tighter quote is a smaller entry charge, not a smaller reservation. What a position ties up follows the contract behind the lot and the setting on the account, and neither of those has a spread term in it. An account quoting from 0.0 pips ties up exactly what a Standard account ties up for the same lots at the same setting.
The reverse is the one that costs. A higher setting frees room, and freed room reads as though it were budget. It is not budget for anything: the schedule that prices the extra lots was fixed by the account model long before the setting was touched, and it prices them at the same rate as the first one.
Which control to settle first
Settle the size first, because both controls are quoted per lot and neither means anything until a size exists. With a size in hand the model becomes one comparison at that size, and the setting becomes a separate question about how much of the account that size commits.
Taken the other way round the reasoning closes into a circle: a setting suggests a size, the size makes a per-lot rate look large or small, and the model gets chosen on a number the setting produced. Size, then model, then setting keeps each choice answering for itself.
What the account model cannot buy
A raw-pricing account is often picked in the belief that it makes a larger position reachable. It does not touch reachability at all. Whether a position is reachable is a question about room - what the account can tie up at its setting, and what is left standing once it has. The model changes the receipt; it does not change the room.
This is also why the two questions are worth asking in separate sittings. A comparison of pricing models is arithmetic at a fixed size and finishes in a minute. A question about room is about what the account is left holding while the position runs, and the answer to it does not appear on any pricing page, on this site or anywhere else.
Settling both controls in an order that does not double back
- Write down the size you actually intend to place, in lots, before looking at either control.
- Price that size on both models: the tariff folded into the spread on Standard, or a raw spread plus $3.50 per lot per side on Raw+ and cTrader.
- Read what the same size ties up at each setting available to you: 3.33% of notional at 1:30, 1% at 1:100, 0.5% at 1:200.
- Look at what the account is left holding after that reservation rather than at what it held before it.
- Only now revisit the size. If it moves, run steps 2 and 3 again instead of assuming either answer carried across.
Step 2 never changes when step 3 does, and step 3 never changes when step 2 does. The only figure both of them answer to is the one written down in step 1.
Which control each question belongs to
| Question | Answered by the account model | Answered by the leverage setting |
|---|---|---|
| What does one lot cost to enter | Yes | No |
| What does one lot tie up while it is open | No | Yes |
| How much of the account is left standing free | No | Yes |
| Will the server accept this ticket | No | Yes |
| What is charged for holding it overnight | No | No |
| What is the contract behind one lot | No | No |
The last two rows belong to the instrument and answer to neither control, which is why they read the same on every account on this site.
Frequently asked questions
Does the FxPro Raw+ account tie up less than Standard?
Does a higher leverage setting reduce the Raw+ commission?
Which of the two controls decides how much room a position takes?
Is the $3.50 charged per lot or against the amount I have tied up?
Can I use the same leverage on Standard and on Raw+?
Does the overnight charge change when I switch to Raw+?
Should I pick the setting or the account type first?
What traders report
This set is an argument about cost arithmetic rather than a verdict on it: several traders weigh the Raw+ fee against how narrow the quote actually gets and conclude the trade-off is fair, one of them adding that metals behave as well as the majors do. It is not unanimous. The three-star review sitting in the same set reports spreads that felt wide and an unwelcome notice about dormant-account fees, which is exactly why we left it in.
I opened a long position on USD/JPY and earned about 100$ in a few days. ngl, spreads are narrow!
For my account, I got instant orders, so spread always matches the set price, and more to the point - fixed spreads for some europairs, which makes or breaks it for my strat pretty much,
Trading costs are FAIR, even for the Raw+ account which comes with a trading fee
If I just focus on my trading, stuff seems to start working. If I watch what influencers say, its a disaster xD I just go raw, on raw acc, raw, hm, dogging it. Works fine, with metals especially
Mixed feelings, supposedly top tier broker, but some spreads are rather high and within days of opening account message about dormant account fees. Will try again soon and update in months to come.
tbh, I prefer trading only on forex market and spreads play a huge role for me. Fortunately, fxpro provides quite tight spreads and I hardly noticed the difference between bid and ask prices